|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Background on the Healthy Schools Act
What the Healthy Schools Act means for you
|
 |
 |
Annual notifications of pesticide use
Notifications before each pesticide treatment
Warning signs before treatments
School recordkeeping
Statewide data on pesticides in schools
Voluntary integrated pest management (IPM) at your school
|
 |
 |
What is integrated pest management (IPM)?
Find information on pesticide hazards
Examples of school IPM programs
|
 |
 |
 |
page top |
 |
 |
 |
The Healthy Schools Act of 2000 (Assembly Bill 2260) put into code
the DPR's existing voluntary school IPM program and added some new
requirements, such as parental notification of
pesticide applications, warning signs in pesticide-treated areas, recordkeeping at schools,
and pesticide use reporting by licensed pest control businesses
that work in schools. more...
Resources:
|
 |
| |
 |
Overview of California IPM in Schools Program |
| |
 |
Healthy Schools Act of 2000 (AB 2260): Summary [pdf] |
| |
 |
Healthy Schools Act of 2000 (AB 2260): Full Text [pdf] |
| |
 |
Healthy Schools Act: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) |
 |
 |
 |
page top |
 |
 |
 |
- Annual Notifications of Pesticide Use
legislative text
The Healthy Schools Act requires each school IPM
coordinator to notify parents of all pesticide products expected to
be applied during the upcoming year. These notifications must identify
the active
ingredient or ingredients in each product, as well as the product name
itself. Remember that there are usually many products that contain a given
active ingredient. Also, there is occasionally more than one active ingredient
in a product. If a school site plans to use a product that was not listed in the
annual notification, the school designee must notify all parents at least
72 hours before application.
Certain pesticides are exempt from posting, notification, or recordkeeping
under the law. The categories of products exempted are:
- Self-contained baits and traps.
- Gels or pastes used for crack-and-crevice treatments.
- Antimicrobials.
- Products listed as minimum-risk pesticides by the U.S. EPA.
- Notifications Before Each Pesticide Treatment
legislative text
School IPM coordinators must notify
interested parents of planned pesticide treatments at least
72 hours before each application. In practice, this
means that parents should receive a letter each year asking if they
would like to register to receive these notifications. If they
register, they should receive some kind of notification (for
example, an e-mail or a letter sent home with students) before
any pesticide treatments are used on school grounds. The notices
must include product name, active ingredient(s), and intended date
of application. Certain pesticides are exempt from notification under the law.
Resources:
Look up active ingredients from product names.
DPR product/label databases.
-
Warning Signs
legislative text
The Healthy Schools Act requires each school site to post warning signs 24
hours before treatment at each site where pesticides will be applied. The
signs must remain for 72 hours after the application.
-
School recordkeeping
legislative text
Pesticide use at school is a matter of public record. The Healthy
Schools Act requires each school site to maintain records of all nonexempt
pesticide use at the school site for a period of four years, and
to make this information available to the public upon request. A
school site may meet these requirements, for example, by retaining
a copy of the warning sign posted for each application. This is
the simplest option, but some schools may choose a more sophisticated
written or computer-based logging system.
Note that some pesticide products are exempt from recordkeeping.
Statewide School Pesticide Use Data
legislative text
California's pesticide use reporting (PUR)
program is recognized as the most comprehensive in the world. The
Healthy Schools Act will increase the reach of the PUR databases to
specifically track pesticides used in specific school
environments. These new reporting requirements take effect January
1, 2002, and will require more detailed use reports, on an
annual basis, from licensed pest control businesses treating for
pests on school sites.
Resources:
Regulations on school pesticide use reporting
Voluntary Integrated Pest
Management (IPM) at Your School
legislative text
DPR and the Healthy Schools Act encourage voluntary adoption of integrated
pest management (IPM) programs by all
California school districts. IPM is a problem-solving approach to pest
management that allows pest managers to minimize the use
of pesticides. Parents can promote least-hazardous pest management programs
by encouraging their school district to develop an IPM policy. A clear
IPM policy statement serves as a public agreement on how pest control
will be performed.
Resources:
Sample School IPM Policy [external web site]
|
 |
 |
 |
page top |
 |
 |
 |
Integrated pest management (IPM) is a widely accepted approach to pest
management that results in effective suppression of pest populations
while minimizing human health and environmental hazards.
more...Resources:
|
 |
| |
 |
Radcliffe's IPM Textbook [external web site]
An extensive online resource. |
| |
 |
Information of IPM Resources, Oregon State University [external web site]
Includes many definitions of IPM. |
| |
 |
Evolution of IPM, US Dept. of Agriculture
[external web site] A short history of IPM. |
 |
 |
 |
page top |
 |
 |
 |
DPR protects public health and the environment with
the nation's most rigorous and comprehensive program
to regulate pesticide use. DPR’ s strict oversight includes
product evaluation and registration, environmental
monitoring, residue testing of fresh produce, worker health
and safety, and local use enforcement through the county
agricultural comissioners.
Still, some pesticides pose lesser risks than others. It
is important to remember that risk depends as much on
exposure as it does on toxicity. For example, a tiny
amount of highly toxic pesticide contained in a sealed bait
may pose less risk than a low-toxicity pesticide sprayed in
the classroom. Therefore, regulation of pesticides does not
focus solely on assessing toxicity but also on managing risk
by controlling exposure.
DPR is committed to promoting effective, least-hazardous pest
management approaches. For this reason, we recommend that measures
to prevent pest infestations always be given first priority. If
pesticide use is necessary, consult an authoritative source of pest
management recommendations (such as publications by DPR or the
University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management
Program). You may also check information on toxicity or exposure
yourself. Below are some helpful resources.
Resources:
|
 |
| |
 |
Look up information on environmental and health effects of pesticides
[external web site] EXTOXNET, produced by a consortium of universities. |
| |
 |
Regulating Pesticides: Who, Why and How? (DPR Publication) |
| |
 |
Other links on pesticide hazards. |
 |
 |
 |
page top |
 |
 |
 |
"Ask someone who has done it." DPR has supported a number of school
IPM programs through its Pest Management Alliance grant programs,
and has recognized others through its
IPM Innovator Awards. DPR has also awarded Pest Management Grants to several school-related demonstration projects.
Resources:
|
 |
| |
Pest Management Alliance Grants |
| |
 |
A Model Integrated Pest Management Plan for Schools (Marin County, 2000) |
| |
 |
To Develop Tools to Overcome Barriers to Implementing a Successful IPM program
for Schools (Self-Insured Schools of California, 1998) |
 |
| |
Pest Management Demonstration Grants |
| |
 |
Kids in Gardens (2000-01) |
| |
 |
Capacity Building on IPM in Urban Agriculture in Bay Area Public Schools and Surrounding Low-Income Communities (1998-99) |
| |
 |
Establishing IPM Programs to Reduce Pesticide Use in Public Buildings (1996-97) |
| |
 |
Establishing IPM Programs to Reduce Pesticide Use in Public Buildings (1995-96) |
 |
| |
IPM Innovator Awards |
| |
 |
The Placer Hills Union School District, 1996 |
| |
 |
The New Haven Unified School District, 1996 |
| |
 |
The Los Angeles, Fremont, and San Diego City Unified School Districts, 1994 |
 |